On the matter of cost, DH is a standalone for $10($5 during the steam seasonal sales) while HoI3+all 4 major DLCs costs $30 although I do have an old HoI3 steam key I could part with that would cut $10 off the price. Hearts of Iron III lets you play the most engaging conflict in world history, World War 2, on all fronts as any country and through multiple different scenarios. (And it sounds like HoI4 is bringing that back, grrr) Guide your nation to glory between 19 and wage war, conduct diplomacy and build your industry in the most detailed World War 2 game ever made. I also think the HoI3 tech system is exceedingly superior to DH's "Tech Teams" BS that screws over minors. Hearts of Iron III lets you play the most engaging conflict in world history, World War 2, on all fronts as any country and through multiple different scenarios. The large nations (specifically Sov) can become a micro managing hell, especially in multiplayer but I will take it any day over DH+Kaiserrich. HoI3 puts a greater emphasis on flanking and creating cut off pockets to destroy and the 10000+ provinces are amazing for that. Don't get me wrong, Darkest Hour is a great World War simulator, if it is the first one that interests you. To be honest I like complexity and HoI3 is far better in that regard due to the increased number of provinces. An Apple Macintosh version was also released by Virtual Programming.
It was released for Microsoft Windows-compatible PCs in 2002. In the game you can control any one nation as World War II unfolds.
It depends what you want, I find that the people who hold up Darkest Hour as superior to HoI3 only do so because they like the reduced complexity. Hearts of Iron is a grand strategy computer game developed by Paradox Interactive and published by Strategy First, set in the years 1936-1948.
0 kommentar(er)
